GCM vs FCM: Key Differences ExplainedGoogle Cloud Messaging (GCM) and Firebase Cloud Messaging (FCM) are both services for sending push notifications to mobile and web applications, but they represent different generations of Google’s notification infrastructure. This article explains their histories, core features, architecture, migration path, and practical differences developers should know when choosing or migrating between them.
Background and history
- GCM (Google Cloud Messaging) launched in 2012 as the successor to C2DM (Cloud to Device Messaging). It provided a way for developers to send downstream messages (server → device) and limited upstream messages (device → server) for Android apps and Chrome apps.
- FCM (Firebase Cloud Messaging) was introduced in 2016 as part of the Firebase platform after Google acquired Firebase. FCM unified and expanded messaging capabilities across Android, iOS, and the web, integrating with other Firebase services and modernizing APIs and SDKs.
GCM was deprecated in April 2018 and officially turned down in April 2019; developers were strongly encouraged to migrate to FCM.
Core concepts and architecture
Both GCM and FCM follow a similar high-level model: an app server (or a Firebase console) sends messages through Google’s cloud messaging servers, which then deliver them to client devices where the app receives and handles them. Key components:
- App server: authenticates and sends message requests.
- Cloud messaging backend: Google-run servers that queue and route messages.
- Client SDK: integrated into the app to receive and handle messages and notifications.
FCM preserves that model but modernizes and extends it:
- Single unified SDK across platforms (Android, iOS, Web).
- Integration with Firebase Console and Firebase services (Analytics, Remote Config, A/B Testing).
- Newer APIs (HTTP v1, legacy HTTP, and XMPP) with improved authentication via OAuth2 and service accounts.
- Enhanced message types and delivery options.
Authentication and APIs
- GCM used API keys for server authentication over an HTTP JSON or XMPP connection.
- FCM supports multiple APIs:
- HTTP v1 API (recommended): uses OAuth 2.0 with service accounts and offers fine-grained features, topics, condition-based targeting, and structured payloads.
- Legacy HTTP API: works with server keys for easier backward compatibility.
- XMPP: supports upstream messages and real-time two-way communication.
Because FCM’s HTTP v1 uses OAuth 2.0 and service accounts, it provides stronger access controls and integrates with IAM for safer production usage.
Message types and payloads
- GCM supported basic data messages and notification messages (displayed by system tray when app is backgrounded).
- FCM expanded message capabilities:
- Notification messages: handled by the OS when app is backgrounded; configurable via title/body/icon.
- Data messages: delivered to the app for custom handling regardless of foreground/background (subject to platform delivery constraints).
- Combined messages: both notification and data payloads in a single message.
- Message options: TTL (time-to-live), priority (normal/high), collapse_key (GCM) vs collapse key & message_id semantics in FCM, and Android-specific fields (channel_id, notification priority).
- Topic messaging, device groups, and condition targeting are available in FCM, with improved subscription management.
Delivery, reliability, and performance
FCM improves on GCM with:
- Better queuing and throttling behavior, refined priority handling, and more predictable background delivery on modern Android versions.
- Integration with Firebase Analytics and other tools to measure delivery and engagement.
- More robust retry/backoff and message collapsing semantics.
However, final delivery can still be affected by device OEM power management, network conditions, and app-specific policies.
Platform coverage
- GCM primarily targeted Android (and Chrome).
- FCM supports:
- Android
- iOS (APNs integration)
- Web (JavaScript, via Web Push)
- C/C++ via Firebase SDKs This cross-platform support simplifies multi-platform messaging using the same console and APIs.
Tooling and developer experience
- FCM integrates with Firebase Console for sending test messages, analytics-driven segmentation, and A/B testing.
- SDKs and documentation have more examples, cloud functions triggers, and server libraries for common languages.
- Debugging: FCM provides clearer diagnostics and delivery metrics in the Firebase Console and through APIs.
Migration considerations
Key steps when migrating from GCM to FCM:
- Update client SDKs to Firebase SDKs and adjust manifest/initialization code.
- Switch server endpoints to FCM HTTP v1 or legacy endpoint and update authentication to service accounts (recommended).
- Map GCM fields to FCM equivalents (collapse_key → collapse_key, replace API key use with OAuth 2.0 where applicable).
- Test message delivery for different payload types and platforms.
- Update topic subscription logic if using topics.
Google provided migration guides; although GCM has been shut down, most apps now run on FCM.
Security and privacy
- FCM’s use of OAuth 2.0 (HTTP v1) and service accounts allows tighter control using IAM roles and avoids embedding long-lived server keys in code.
- Messages are routed via Google’s infrastructure; confidential payloads should be encrypted at the application level if end-to-end confidentiality is required.
When to use FCM today
- New projects: use FCM for push notifications across Android, iOS, and web.
- Existing GCM apps: migrate to FCM — GCM endpoints are deprecated and no longer functional.
- If you need tight integration with analytics, remote config, or cloud functions, FCM offers convenient Firebase integrations.
Summary
- GCM is deprecated; FCM is the modern, supported replacement with cross-platform SDKs, improved APIs (OAuth 2.0), and richer messaging features.
- FCM improves reliability, developer tooling, platform support, and security compared to GCM.
- Migration requires updating client SDKs and server authentication but provides long-term support and additional Firebase integrations.
Leave a Reply